الصفحة الرئيسية - شروق الماركسية وغروبها / ميثم الجنابي - أرشيف التعليقات - Marxism as a Patriarchal Science - Talal Alrubaie

Marxism as a Patriarchal Science - Talal Alrubaie

- Marxism as a Patriarchal Science

العدد: 20295

Talal Alrubaie

2009 / 4 / 27 - 23:13
التحكم: الحوار المتمدن

I read your article with interest and wish to add the following comments.
Popper refused to recognize Marxism, and incidentally psychoanalysis, as science because they failed his falsification criteria that determine his definition of what constitutes True Science as opposed to False Science. Hence, his stance on Marxism was not exclusively, or perhaps not even significantly, ideologically motivated. Rather, it was influenced by his adaptation of the principle of falsification as the criterion of differentiating science from other fields of knowledge. His stance on psychoanalysis, having been seen by dogmatic Marxists, biased towards Pavlov’s psychology and considering psychoanalysis a bourgeois non-science, reveals that his views were based on his philosophy of science, rather than on ideological motivation or ignorance of economics-this ignorance is not a flaw in any case as he was a philosopher of science, not an economist. This, however, does not mean that he personally was not disinclined against Marxism. Psychology of thinkers and scientists determine their theories in any

للاطلاع على الموضوع والتعليقات الأخرى انقر على الرابط أدناه:
شروق الماركسية وغروبها / ميثم الجنابي