الصفحة الرئيسية - نظرة جديدة على -مجمع البحرين- القرآني / كامل النجار - أرشيف التعليقات - Reply to Masry - A Reader

Reply to Masry - A Reader

- Reply to Masry

العدد: 17260

A Reader

2009 / 4 / 5 - 05:46
التحكم: الحوار المتمدن

Apart from the few revisionists (Wansborough, Crone, et al) who popularized a later start date of Islam, and whose views has largely now been discredited by mainstream historians, Muslim version of events stands as the working hypothesis by most researchers in the field until proven otherwise. Accordingly, the prevailing opinion is that Muhammad was born in 570 AD, engaged in mercantile trips until around 610 where he started his prophetic career, stayed in Mecca until approximately 622, fled to Medina, and stayed there until his death in 632. Now the Actiname is claimed to have been signed by him in 623, which is a year after his immigration to Medina; how on earth could he have managed to do that? With some hallucinations, I can be led to believe that prior to his prophetic claim (before 610) and during his travels to the Levant, he took a detour to Sinai (plausible though hard to believe), but then again he was just a merchant, and had no temporal or spiritual authority to have written that document then. The only other possibility is that he wrote it much later on, after his reig

للاطلاع على الموضوع والتعليقات الأخرى انقر على الرابط أدناه:
نظرة جديدة على -مجمع البحرين- القرآني / كامل النجار