الصفحة الرئيسية - آراء مثيرة حول أصول الإسلام والمسيحية / نادر قريط - أرشيف التعليقات - Thank you again. - A Reader

Thank you again. - A Reader

- Thank you again.

العدد: 14473

A Reader

2009 / 3 / 15 - 11:56
التحكم: الكاتب-ة

Actually, I spoke too fast; I found and read the article you pointed out by Morris Aique in the archives, in which he lays out detailed thesis of what Bashir, and Puin/Bobb have written in their respective books. They present plausible, but not inescapable explanation for those early foundation centuries. In face of the inconspicuous absence of corroborating manuscripts dating to the period, and the scanty mention in external contemporary writings, it’s rather easy to discount the “accepted version of events” as merely salvation history, and use this line of thought to debunk fundamentalist Christian or Muslim arguments. It’s less easy, but very possible to couple the previous argument, with refutations of scriptural, ontological, or cosmological arguments to debunk faith altogether. Nevertheless, it’s very difficult-in my empiricist viewpoint-to use the scanty available evidence to construct alternative history; I admit it’s a great intellectual exercise, and a good mental gymnastic, but in the department of scientific inquiry, I’m afraid it still remains a minority opinion, awaitin

للاطلاع على الموضوع والتعليقات الأخرى انقر على الرابط أدناه:
آراء مثيرة حول أصول الإسلام والمسيحية / نادر قريط