Women of the World Unite (V)

Women of the World Unite (V)

Ghiath El-Marzouk


The point for the woman is not to take power
Out of the man [whatsoever],
That would not change the world:
The point is to destroy the idea of ‘power’ altogether!
Simone de Beauvoir


Women of the World Unite!

Know that [your] traditionally dominating ‘husbands’, if they do exist willy-nilly, are beyond the shadow of a doubt the most obsequious, most submissive, slaves to the notion of ‘domination’ itself, in the first place. Know also that even the far more obsequious, far more submissive, of such slaves, in any part of this covertly (or even overtly) partitioned Arab World, are nothing but belittled, derogated and disparaged versions of what that peerless Afro-American Revolutionary called, ‘house slaves’ specifically, those inveterately timorous and perfidious slaves whose jugular veins were always bulging with venom and with pus and even with all sorts of filth and scum –thus, the notion in question is no more than a symptom of compulsive obsession which presupposes the very counter-notions of defiance and resistance, thereby emitting their flashes of sunlight at this gloomy time from shade to shade.

Furthermore, even the very concept of ‘woman’ itself is merely and simply a patriarchal, masculine concept from the viewpoint of him being the ‘subject’ and her being the ‘object’ both structurally and indicatively: ‘structurally’ in the sense that he is the active ‘constructor’ and she is the passive ‘constructed’ in the very beginning, and ‘indicatively’ in the sense that he is the causative ‘indicator’ and she is the resultative ‘indicated’ at the very end!

[Maxim V]

***

يَا نِسَاءَ العَالَمِ اتَّحِدْنَ (5)

غياث المرزوق

لَنْ يُغيِّرَ الدُّنْيَا بَتَاتًا أَنْ تَرُومَ المَرْأَةُ رَمْأَ القُوَّةِ مِنْ مَرْمَى الرَّجُلْ:
اَلْرَّوْمُ، ذَاتًا، يَرْمَأُ فِي تَدْمِيرِ فِكْرَةِ «القُوَّةِ»، مَثَلاً مِنْ أَسْمَى المُثُلْ!
سيمون دو بوفوار


يَا نِسَاءَ العَالَمِ اتَّحِدْنَ!

اِعْلَمْنَ أَنَّ «بِعَالَكُنَّ» المُتَسَيِّدِينَ التَّقْلِيدِيِّينَ، إِنْ تَوَاجَدُوا طَوْعًا أَوْ كَرْهًا، إِنَّمَا هُمْ أَذَلُّ أَشْكَالِ العَبِيدِ لِفِكْرَةِ «السِّيَادَةِ» وَ«السَّيْدُودَةِ» بِالذَّاتِ، قَبْلَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ. وَاعْلَمْنَ أَنَّ أَذَلَّ أَشْكَالِ العَبِيدِ هَؤُلاءِ، فِي أَيِّمَا جُزْءٍ مِنْ أَجْزَاءِ هَذَا «العَالَمِ العَرَبِيِّ» المُجَزَّأِ سِرًّا أَوْ جَهْرًا، إِنَّمَا هُمْ شَاكِلاتٌ مُصَغَّرَةٌ مُكَوَّرَةٌ مُحَقَّرَةٌ مِنْ شَاكِلاتِ مَنْ سَمَّاهُمْ ذَلِكَ الثَّوْرِيُّ الأَفْرُو-أَمْرِيكِيُّ الفَذُّ «عَبِيدَ المَنَازِلِ» بِالتَّحْدِيدِ، أُولَئِكَ العَبِيدَ (الرَّعَادِيدَ) الغَادِرِينَ أَيَّمَا غَدْرٍ مِنْ ذَوي الأَوْدَاجِ المُكْتَظَّةِ دَائِمًا بِالسِّمَامِ وَالصَّدِيدِ وَالقَيْحِ وَحَتَّى القَيْءِ – فَالفِكْرَةُ المَعْنِيَّةُ لا تَعْدُو أَنْ تَكُونَ، إِذَنْ، عَرَضًا هَاجِسِيًّا قَهْرِيًّا يَفْتَرِضُ الاِفْتِرَاضَ السَّبْقِيَّ تَسْيَارَ تَحَدِّيهِ وَالتَّصَدِّي لَهُ «شَمْسِيًّا»، شَاءَ الزَّمَانُ الحِنْدِسِيُّ أَمْ أَبَى، مِنْ فَيْءٍ لِفَيْءٍ.

إِضَافَةً إِلى ذَلِكَ، حَتَّى فِكْرَةُ «المَرْأَةِ»، فِي حَدِّ ذَاتِهَا، إِنْ هِيَ إِلاَّ فِكْرَةٌ «أَبَوِيَّةٌ» وَ/أَوْ «ذُكُورِيَّةٌ» مِنْ حَيْثُ كَوْنُهُ «الوَاضِعَ» وَكَوْنُهَا «المَوْضُوعَ» مَبْنًى وَمَعْنًى، سَوَاءً بِسَوَاءٍ: مِنْ حَيْثُ المَبْنَى بِمَبْنَى أَنَّهُ هُوَ «البَانِي» الفَاعِلِيُّ وَأَنَّهَا هِيَ «المَبْنِيُّ» المُنْفَعِلِيُّ فِي بَدْءِ الاِبْتِدَاءِ، وَمِنْ حَيْثُ المَعْنَى بِمَعْنَى أَنَّهُ هُوَ «العَانِي» الجَاعِلِيُّ وَأَنَّهَا هِيَ «المَعْنِيُّ» المُنْجَعِلِيُّ فِي نَهْيِ الاِنْتِهَاءِ!

[القَوْلُ الخَامِسُ]

***

Rate the article
Bad	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Very good
Result : 100%							Participated in the vote : 150