Women of the World Unite (III)

Women of the World Unite (III)

Ghiath El-Marzouk


Indications of male chauvinism started to appear,
When they invented [the idea] that God was a visual man.
Luis Vidales

Women of the World Unite!

Know that all monotheistic religions are, in effect, theological systems which are founded first and foremost on the manliness of God as a being in its entirety, and that this manliness has before long become a diachronic motivation for all those male-sexist predilections and tendencies which have been adopted consciously (or, rather, unconsciously) by the majority of the ‘sons of Adam’ from place to place towards the majority of the ‘daughters of Eve’ in the course of time. The inception of such male-sexist predilections and tendencies is most heinously exemplified in the first of childbirth laws, as enunciated by this (manly) God in the twelfth chapter of the book of Leviticus in the Old Testament: “If a woman conceives and bears a male, she is unclean for seven days. Just like the days of her menstruation, she is unclean. […] If she conceives and gives birth to a female, she is unclean for two weeks, just like her menstruation, she is unclean. She must then wait sixty-six days to be completely purified from her bleeding”.

Whereas, neither in the field of biology nor in the field of gynaecology, has it been scientifically proven with conclusive evidence that such a mythical assumption is true, an assumption which is still taken for granted in its biblical formulation to this day, but whose intention is no more than a religious (or theological) artifice simply and solely fabricated to sustain the metaphysical emphasis on chauvinistic discrimination between the two sexes in favour of the male rather than the female!

[Maxim III]

***

يَا نِسَاءَ العَالَمِ اتَّحِدْنَ (3)

غياث المرزوق

لَقَدْ بَدَأَتْ عَلائِمُ الجِنْسَوِيَّةِ الذُّكُورِيَّةِ بِالظُّهُورِ،
عِنْدَمَا بَدَأُوا يَبْتَدِعُونَ [فِكْرَةَ] أَنَّ اللهَ رَجُلٌ مَنْظُورٌ!
لويس ڤ-;-يداليس


يَا نِسَاءَ العَالَمِ اتَّحِدْنَ!

اِعْلَمْنَ أَنَّ الأَدْيَانَ التَّوْحِيدِيَّةَ كُلَّهَا إِنَّمَا هِيَ مَنْظُومَاتٌ لَاهُوتِيَّةٌ تَقُومُ، قَبْلَ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ، عَلى رُجُولِيَّةِ الإِلَهِ كَكَائِنٍ مِنَ الكَوَائِنِ قَلْبًا وَقَالِبًا، وَأَنَّ هذِهِ الرُّجُولِيَّةَ سَرْعَانَ مَا أَصْبَحَتْ مَدْعَاةً تَزَمُّنِيَّةً لِسَائِرِ تلك المُيُولِ وَالنَّزَعَاتِ الجِنْسَوِيَّةِ الذُّكُورِيَّةِ التي تَبَنَّاهَا «أَبْنَاءُ آدَمَ» جُلُّهُمْ، عَنْ وَعْيٍ أَوْ عَنْ لَاوَعْيٍ أَوْ عَنْ مَا بَيْنَ بَيْنَ، عَلى جَرِّ المَكَانِ، تَبَنَّوْهَا إِزَاءَ «بَنَاتِ حَوَّاءَ» جُلِّهِنَّ عَلى مَرِّ الزَّمَانِ. وَقدْ تَجَسَّدَ اسْتهْلالُ تلك المُيُولِ وَالنَّزَعَاتِ الجِنْسَوِيَّةِ الذُّكُورِيَّةِ بِأشْنَعٍ تَجْسِيدِهِ في أُولَى شَرَائِعِ المَخَاضِ وَالوِلَادَةِ، حَسْبَمَا جَاءَ ذِكْرُهَا عَلى لِسَانِ هذَا الإِلَهِ (الرُّجُولِيِّ) في الإِصْحَاحِ الثَّانِيَ عَشَرَ مِنْ سِفْرِ اللاَّوِيِّينَ في العَهْدِ القَدِيم: «إِذَا حَبِلَتِ امْرَأَةٌ فَوَلَدَتْ ذَكَرًا، تَكُونُ نَجِسَةً (أَوْ غَيْرَ طَاهِرَةٍ) سَبْعَةَ أَيَّامٍ كَمَا في أَيَّامِ طَمْثِهَا. [...] وَإِنْ حَبِلَتِ امْرَأَةٌ فَوَلَدَتْ أُنْثَى، تَكُونُ نَجِسَةً (أَوْ غَيْرَ طَاهِرَةٍ) أُسْبُوعَيْنِ كَمَا في أَيَّامِ طَمْثِهَا، وَيَنْبَغِي عَلَيْهَا عِنْدَئِذٍ أَنْ تَنْتَظِرَ سِتَّةً وَسِتِّينَ يَوْمًا لِكَيْ يَتَطَهَّرَ دَمُهَا كُلِّيَّةً».

بَيْدَ أَنَّهُ لَيْسَ ثَمَّةَ في عِلْمَ الأَحْيَاءِ (أَوِ البيولوجيا) وَلا في عِلْمَ أَمْرَاضِ النِّسَاءِ (أَوِ الجينوكوجيا) مَا يُبَرْهِنُ بِالدَّلِيلِ العِلْمِيِّ بُرْهَانًا قَاطِعًا مَدَى صِحَّةِ هذَا الادِّعَاءِ الأُسْطُورِيِّ الذي لَمْ يزَلْ قَائِمًا بِعَيْنِ الحُسْبَانِ والاِهْتِمَامِ ضِمْنَ صِيغَتِهِ التَّوْرَاتِيَّةِ حَتَّى هذَهِ الأَيَّامِ – وَهُوَ ادِّعَاءٌ أُسْطُورِيٌّ لا يَعْدُو أنْ يَكونَ خِدْعَةً دِينِيَّةً (أَوْ لاهُوتِيَّةً) تَخَرُّصِيَّةً غَايَتُهَا الأُولَى وَالأَخِيرَةُ أَنْ يُصَانَ التَّوْكِيدُ الغَيْبِيُّ عَلى التَّمْيِيزِ الشُّوفِينِيِّ بَيْنَ الجِنْسَيْنِ لِصَالِحِ الذَّكَرِ دُونَ الأُنْثَى!

[القَوْلُ الثَّالِثُ]

***

Rate the article
Bad	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	Very good
Result : 100%							Participated in the vote : 351